You’ve probably experienced the problem: multi-agent systems are powerful but expensive. Each agent call costs tokens, each coordination step adds latency, and debugging agent-to-agent communication feels like herding cats. What if you could get the same results with a single model that thinks like multiple agents?
That’s exactly what Chain-of-Agents (CoA) delivers. By training single models to internally simulate multi-agent collaboration, researchers have achieved an 84.6% reduction in inference costs while actually improving performance on key benchmarks.
Table of contents
The Core Innovation: Teaching Models to Role-Play
Traditional multi-agent systems work like a team meeting—different specialized agents pass messages back and forth, each contributing their expertise. It’s effective but wasteful. Most of the tokens go to coordination overhead rather than solving your actual problem.
Chain-of-Agents takes a different approach. Instead of running separate agents, you train a single model to internally coordinate different ‘roles’ and tools. The model learns to:
- Switch between specialized personas (planner, coder, debugger)
- Activate the right tools at the right time
- Maintain coherent state without inter-agent chatter
- Reflect on its own outputs to self-correct
Think of it as the difference between hiring a team versus hiring one exceptionally versatile expert who can wear multiple hats.
How They Built It: Distillation Meets Reinforcement Learning
The training process is clever. First, they distill successful multi-agent system runs into Chain-of-Agents formatted traces. These traces capture the reasoning patterns of multi-agent collaboration without the communication overhead.
The training happens in two stages:
Stage 1: Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT)
The model learns from reformatted ReAct-style data, both short and long reasoning chains. Progressive filtering ensures only high-quality trajectories make it through. The model learns to:
- Plan before acting
- Call tools efficiently
- Reflect on observations
- Maintain coherent reasoning across steps
Stage 2: Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Here’s where it gets interesting. The model performs tool-aware rollouts on new tasks, receiving rewards based on:
- Task correctness (via LLM-as-Judge for web tasks)
- Exact match for QA tasks
- Test case success for code/math
This RL stage is crucial—it teaches the model to coordinate tools and reasoning robustly, not just mimic training data.
The Numbers That Matter
With Qwen-2.5-32B as the backbone, the results speak for themselves:
General Agent Tasks:
- GAIA: 55.3% (new SOTA for pass@1)
- BrowseComp: 11.1%
- HumanLifeBenchmark: 18.0%
- WebWalker: 63.0%
Code and Math:
- AIME 2025: 59.8%
- MATH-500: 94.6%
- OlympiadBench: 72.1%
- LiveCodeBench v5: 47.9%
But here’s the kicker—these results come with massive efficiency gains:
- 84.6% reduction in token costs compared to multi-agent systems
- Fewer tool calls needed
- Single model inference instead of multiple agent calls
Why This Changes Everything
For Your Development Workflow
Instead of orchestrating complex multi-agent pipelines, you can now:
- Deploy a single model that handles multiple roles
- Reduce latency from inter-agent communication
- Simplify debugging (one model, one log stream)
- Scale without multiplying costs
For Your Production Systems
The efficiency gains translate directly to your bottom line:
- Lower API costs (fewer tokens, fewer calls)
- Faster response times (no agent coordination overhead)
- More predictable behavior (single model consistency)
- Easier monitoring and optimization
For Test-Time Scaling
Best-of-3 and pass@3 sampling show dramatic improvements:
- GAIA: 69.9% with best-of-3
- HumanLifeBenchmark: 33.2% with pass@3
This means you can trade a small amount of compute for significant accuracy gains when needed.
What This Means for You
If you’re building with LLMs today, Chain-of-Agents offers a clear path forward:
-
Start with single-agent architectures. Before reaching for complex multi-agent frameworks, consider whether a CoA-style model could handle your use case.
-
Focus on role prompting. Even without training your own model, you can apply CoA principles by crafting prompts that explicitly invoke different roles and reasoning modes.
-
Measure token efficiency. Track not just accuracy but tokens-per-task. You might find that simpler architectures with better prompting outperform complex agent systems.
-
Watch for CoA-trained models. As more models adopt this training approach, you’ll have access to drop-in replacements for multi-agent systems.
The Practical Takeaway
Chain-of-Agents isn’t just a research curiosity—it’s a blueprint for how production AI systems will evolve. The era of expensive, chatty multi-agent systems is ending. The future belongs to single models that can think like entire teams.
You don’t need to wait for the future. Start experimenting with role-based prompting today. Measure your token usage. Question whether that complex agent pipeline really needs to be complex.
The best architecture isn’t always the most sophisticated one. Sometimes it’s the one that does more with less.
References:
- Paper: Chain-of-Agents: Large Language Models Collaborating on Long-Context Tasks
- Project: https://chain-of-agents-afm.github.io
I hope you found this article helpful. If you want to take your agentic AI to the next level, consider booking a consultation or subscribing to premium content.